A Survey on Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for Student Adaptability Prediction in Educational Systems

Main Article Content

Sushmita Gour 
Kamlesh Raghuvanshi 
Ram kumar Sahu 

Abstract

Education is an important part of growing knowledge, skills and adaptability in today's rapidly evolving society. The 
digital revolution has led to the widespread adoption of online learning platforms, smart tutoring systems, and data-driven learning 
environments in education, enhancing learning effectiveness and accessibility. This is because the difficulty of predicting students' 
adaptability has become an important research topic, helping to understand learning difficulties, improve learning outcomes and 
personalize learning. This survey explores how interpretable machine learning (IML) techniques can be used to predict student 
adaptability in the context of education. It explores machine learning and deep learning models such as Decision Trees, Random 
Forests, Support Vector Machines, XGBoost and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for learning student behaviour, 
engagement and learning patterns. Furthermore, the paper explores the concept of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods 
(including SHAP analysis, LIME, feature importance analysis, and rule-based explanations) that contribute to making AI in 
education more transparent and trusted. In smart educational environments, the results indicate that applicable AI methods enhance 
the adaptive learning approaches, timely interventions, provide individual assistance to students, and provide clear analytics. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Review Article

Author Biography

Sushmita Gour , CSE-TIT (Excellence) 




How to Cite

A Survey on Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for Student Adaptability Prediction in Educational Systems (S. Gour , K. . Raghuvanshi , & R. kumar Sahu  , Trans.). (2026). Journal of Global Research in Multidisciplinary Studies(JGRMS), 2(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20841827

References

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

Portia and R. Gupta, “Digital Evolution in Education,” Int. Res. J.

Adv. Eng. Manag., vol. 2, no. 09, pp. 2911–2917, Sep. 2024, doi:

10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0429.

H. Sharma, S. Agarwal, M. Goel, and R. Sharma, “Revolutionizing

Learning: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Education

Systems,” in 2025 5th International Conference on Internet of

Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU), Dehradun, India:

IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6, November. doi: 10.1109/IOT

SIU65919.2025.11402748.

K. Stockinger, R. Rinas, and M. Daumiller, “Student adaptability,

emotions, and achievement: Navigating new academic terrains in

a global crisis,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 90, p. 102046, Aug.

2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102046.

R. Lingam, “AI-Powered Framework for Evaluating Child

Friendly Mobile Applications,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Intell., vol.

4, no. 4, pp. 535–549, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15624307.

A. Malik et al., “Forecasting students’ adaptability in online

entrepreneurship education using modified ensemble machine

learning model,” Array, vol. 19, p. 100303, Sep. 2023, doi:

10.1016/j.array.2023.100303.

V. Rajendran, D. Besiahgari, S. C. Patil, V. Challagulla, and M.

Chandrashekaraiah, “Academic Temporal Pattern Mining for

Enhanced Student Performance Prediction: A Hybrid Machine

Learning Approach,” in 2025 International Conference on Data

Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI), IEEE,

Mar.

2025,

pp.

10.1109/ICDSAAI65575.2025.11011532.

E. Elbasi, M. Nadeem, Y. I. Alzoubi, A. E. Topcu, and G.

Varghese, “Machine Learning in Education: Innovations, Impacts,

and Ethical Considerations,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 128741

128770, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3590134.

R. Rao Thallada, N. Alapati, and K. Nallabothu, “Explainable AI

Driven Predictive Risk Management Framework for Enterprise

GRC Platforms,” Apr. 09, 2026. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs

9328473/v1.

L. Liu and L. Wan, “Innovative models for enhanced student

adaptability and performance in educational environments,” PLoS

One, vol. 19, no. 9, p. e0307221, Sep. 2024, doi:

10.1371/journal.pone.0307221.

G. T. Yamamoto and F. Karaman, “Education 2.0,” Horiz., vol. 19,

no. 2, pp. 109–117, May 2011, doi: 10.1108/10748121111138308.

E. Tikhonova and L. Raitskaya, “Education 4.0: The Concept,

Skills, and Research,” J. Lang. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Mar.

2023, doi: 10.17323/jle. 2023.17001.

A. N. Pathak, “Exploring the Relationship Between Learning

Adaptability and Academic Achievement,” Glob. J. Progress.

Educ. A Ref. Res. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2022, doi:

10.46360/globus.edu.220222027.

S. Karabalaev, G. Karabalaeva, J. Niyazova, S. Nurbekova, and D.

Aytimbetova, “Research on the socio-psychological adaptation of

students with disabilities in higher education institutions,” Ric. Di

Psicol., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 57–88, Feb. 2026, doi:

10.3280/rip2025oa21843.

Z. Li et al., “Students’ online learning adaptability and their

continuous usage intention across different disciplines,” Humanit.

Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 838, Nov. 2023, doi:

10.1057/s41599-023-02376-5.

I. Purbasari, M. Yusuf, Subagya, S. Marmoah, and A. A. Alali,

“Development of a community-based social collaborative e

learning model for adaptability of higher education students in

Indonesia,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.

2025.1487484.

D. W. Putwain, K. Loderer, D. Gallard, and J. Beaumont, “School

related subjective well‐being promotes subsequent adaptability,

achievement, and positive behavioral conduct,” Br. J. Educ.

Psychol., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 92–108, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjep.

12266.

A. Chen, “Relationship between Family Socioeconomic Status and

Online Education Usage: a Data Analysis Based on K-12

Students,” J. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 339–350, Nov.

2024, doi: 10.70376/jerp.v2i3.205.

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

1–6.

doi:

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

L. Wu and J. M. W. Gopez, “A Review of Academic Motivation

and Student Engagement in Blended Learning within the Chinese

Educational Context,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1

8, 2024.

Iqra, “A systematic – Review of academic stress intended to

improve the educational journey of learners,” Methods Psychol.,

vol. 11, p. 100163, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2024.100163.

R. Radicuks, I. Bula-Biteniece, B. Boobani, and S. Vilks, “Digital

literacy in school education: A qualitative systematic review,”

Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, July, 2025.

M. S. Khine, “Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics,”

in Artificial Intelligence in Education, Singapore: Springer Nature

Singapore, 2024, pp. 1–159. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-9350-1_1.

C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Educational data mining and learning

analytics: An updated survey,” WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov.,

vol. 10, no. 3, p. e1355, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/widm. 1355.

A. Rabelo, M. W. Rodrigues, C. Nobre, S. Isotani, and L. Zárate,

“Educational data mining and learning analytics: a review of

educational management in e-learning,” Inf. Discov. Deliv., vol.

52, no. 2, pp. 149–163, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IDD-10-2022

0099.

A. . Feroz Khan and S. R. A. Samad, “Evaluating Online Learning

Adaptability in Students Using Machine Learning-Based

Techniques: A Novel Analytical Approach,” Educ. Sci. Manag.,

vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–34, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.56578/esm020103.

K. Dixit, “Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence for Sales

Forecasting,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol., vol. 60, no.

3, p. 981, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-12750G.

K. Topuz, A. Bajaj, K. Coussement, and T. L. Urban,

“Interpretable machine learning and explainable artificial

intelligence,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 347, no. 2, pp. 775–782, April,

2025, doi: 10.1007/s10479-025-06577-w.

D. Pantazatos, A. Trilivas, K. Meli, D. Kotsifakos, and C.

Douligeris, “Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial

Intelligence in Education and Training - Status and Trends,” Int.

Wireless. Internet Conf., vol. 527, pp. 110–122, 2024, doi:

10.1007/978-3-031-58053-6_8.

R. Meylani, “Explainability in Educational AI: A Critical

Systematic Review,” in 4th International Science, Education, Art

& Technology Symposium, 2025, pp. 403–415, October.

S. Gunasekara and M. Saarela, “Explainable AI in Education:

Techniques and Qualitative Assessment,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no.

3, p. 1239, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15031239.

I. K. Nti and S. Ramanayake, “Explainable machine learning for

student dropout prediction and tailored interventions in online

personalized education,” Discov. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 288,

Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44163-026-01016-6.

E. De La Hoz, C. Garcia-Yerena, and I. Torres-Rojas, “Actionable

Learning Analytics: Predicting University Performance Levels

with Interpretable Machine Learning,” J. Effic. Responsibility.

Educ. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Mar. 2026, doi:

10.7160/eriesj. 2026.190102.

M. Husayn, O. R. Adegboye, and A. Alzubi, “GWO-Optimized

Ensemble Learning for Interpretable and Accurate Prediction of

Student

Academic Performance in Smart Learning

Environments,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 22, p. 12163, Nov. 2025,

doi: 10.3390/app152212163.

S. G. Essa, T. Celik, and N. E. Human-Hendricks, “Personalized

adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning

techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature

review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 48392–48409, 2023.

D. Goštautaitė and L. Sakalauskas, “Multi-Label Classification

and Explanation Methods for Students’ Learning Style Prediction

and Interpretation,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1–19, May,

2022, doi: 10.3390/app12115396

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.