A Survey on Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for Student Adaptability Prediction in Educational Systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Education is an important part of growing knowledge, skills and adaptability in today's rapidly evolving society. The
digital revolution has led to the widespread adoption of online learning platforms, smart tutoring systems, and data-driven learning
environments in education, enhancing learning effectiveness and accessibility. This is because the difficulty of predicting students'
adaptability has become an important research topic, helping to understand learning difficulties, improve learning outcomes and
personalize learning. This survey explores how interpretable machine learning (IML) techniques can be used to predict student
adaptability in the context of education. It explores machine learning and deep learning models such as Decision Trees, Random
Forests, Support Vector Machines, XGBoost and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for learning student behaviour,
engagement and learning patterns. Furthermore, the paper explores the concept of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods
(including SHAP analysis, LIME, feature importance analysis, and rule-based explanations) that contribute to making AI in
education more transparent and trusted. In smart educational environments, the results indicate that applicable AI methods enhance
the adaptive learning approaches, timely interventions, provide individual assistance to students, and provide clear analytics.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal of Global Research in Multidisciplinary Studies (JGRMS) the right of first publication. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original author(s), source, and publication are properly credited. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, in accordance with the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
Portia and R. Gupta, “Digital Evolution in Education,” Int. Res. J.
Adv. Eng. Manag., vol. 2, no. 09, pp. 2911–2917, Sep. 2024, doi:
10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0429.
H. Sharma, S. Agarwal, M. Goel, and R. Sharma, “Revolutionizing
Learning: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Education
Systems,” in 2025 5th International Conference on Internet of
Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU), Dehradun, India:
IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6, November. doi: 10.1109/IOT
SIU65919.2025.11402748.
K. Stockinger, R. Rinas, and M. Daumiller, “Student adaptability,
emotions, and achievement: Navigating new academic terrains in
a global crisis,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 90, p. 102046, Aug.
2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102046.
R. Lingam, “AI-Powered Framework for Evaluating Child
Friendly Mobile Applications,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Intell., vol.
4, no. 4, pp. 535–549, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15624307.
A. Malik et al., “Forecasting students’ adaptability in online
entrepreneurship education using modified ensemble machine
learning model,” Array, vol. 19, p. 100303, Sep. 2023, doi:
10.1016/j.array.2023.100303.
V. Rajendran, D. Besiahgari, S. C. Patil, V. Challagulla, and M.
Chandrashekaraiah, “Academic Temporal Pattern Mining for
Enhanced Student Performance Prediction: A Hybrid Machine
Learning Approach,” in 2025 International Conference on Data
Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI), IEEE,
Mar.
2025,
pp.
10.1109/ICDSAAI65575.2025.11011532.
E. Elbasi, M. Nadeem, Y. I. Alzoubi, A. E. Topcu, and G.
Varghese, “Machine Learning in Education: Innovations, Impacts,
and Ethical Considerations,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 128741
128770, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3590134.
R. Rao Thallada, N. Alapati, and K. Nallabothu, “Explainable AI
Driven Predictive Risk Management Framework for Enterprise
GRC Platforms,” Apr. 09, 2026. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs
9328473/v1.
L. Liu and L. Wan, “Innovative models for enhanced student
adaptability and performance in educational environments,” PLoS
One, vol. 19, no. 9, p. e0307221, Sep. 2024, doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0307221.
G. T. Yamamoto and F. Karaman, “Education 2.0,” Horiz., vol. 19,
no. 2, pp. 109–117, May 2011, doi: 10.1108/10748121111138308.
E. Tikhonova and L. Raitskaya, “Education 4.0: The Concept,
Skills, and Research,” J. Lang. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Mar.
2023, doi: 10.17323/jle. 2023.17001.
A. N. Pathak, “Exploring the Relationship Between Learning
Adaptability and Academic Achievement,” Glob. J. Progress.
Educ. A Ref. Res. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2022, doi:
10.46360/globus.edu.220222027.
S. Karabalaev, G. Karabalaeva, J. Niyazova, S. Nurbekova, and D.
Aytimbetova, “Research on the socio-psychological adaptation of
students with disabilities in higher education institutions,” Ric. Di
Psicol., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 57–88, Feb. 2026, doi:
10.3280/rip2025oa21843.
Z. Li et al., “Students’ online learning adaptability and their
continuous usage intention across different disciplines,” Humanit.
Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 838, Nov. 2023, doi:
10.1057/s41599-023-02376-5.
I. Purbasari, M. Yusuf, Subagya, S. Marmoah, and A. A. Alali,
“Development of a community-based social collaborative e
learning model for adaptability of higher education students in
Indonesia,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.
2025.1487484.
D. W. Putwain, K. Loderer, D. Gallard, and J. Beaumont, “School
related subjective well‐being promotes subsequent adaptability,
achievement, and positive behavioral conduct,” Br. J. Educ.
Psychol., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 92–108, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjep.
12266.
A. Chen, “Relationship between Family Socioeconomic Status and
Online Education Usage: a Data Analysis Based on K-12
Students,” J. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 339–350, Nov.
2024, doi: 10.70376/jerp.v2i3.205.
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
1–6.
doi:
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
L. Wu and J. M. W. Gopez, “A Review of Academic Motivation
and Student Engagement in Blended Learning within the Chinese
Educational Context,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1
8, 2024.
Iqra, “A systematic – Review of academic stress intended to
improve the educational journey of learners,” Methods Psychol.,
vol. 11, p. 100163, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2024.100163.
R. Radicuks, I. Bula-Biteniece, B. Boobani, and S. Vilks, “Digital
literacy in school education: A qualitative systematic review,”
Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, July, 2025.
M. S. Khine, “Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics,”
in Artificial Intelligence in Education, Singapore: Springer Nature
Singapore, 2024, pp. 1–159. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-9350-1_1.
C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Educational data mining and learning
analytics: An updated survey,” WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov.,
vol. 10, no. 3, p. e1355, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/widm. 1355.
A. Rabelo, M. W. Rodrigues, C. Nobre, S. Isotani, and L. Zárate,
“Educational data mining and learning analytics: a review of
educational management in e-learning,” Inf. Discov. Deliv., vol.
52, no. 2, pp. 149–163, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IDD-10-2022
0099.
A. . Feroz Khan and S. R. A. Samad, “Evaluating Online Learning
Adaptability in Students Using Machine Learning-Based
Techniques: A Novel Analytical Approach,” Educ. Sci. Manag.,
vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–34, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.56578/esm020103.
K. Dixit, “Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence for Sales
Forecasting,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol., vol. 60, no.
3, p. 981, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-12750G.
K. Topuz, A. Bajaj, K. Coussement, and T. L. Urban,
“Interpretable machine learning and explainable artificial
intelligence,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 347, no. 2, pp. 775–782, April,
2025, doi: 10.1007/s10479-025-06577-w.
D. Pantazatos, A. Trilivas, K. Meli, D. Kotsifakos, and C.
Douligeris, “Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial
Intelligence in Education and Training - Status and Trends,” Int.
Wireless. Internet Conf., vol. 527, pp. 110–122, 2024, doi:
10.1007/978-3-031-58053-6_8.
R. Meylani, “Explainability in Educational AI: A Critical
Systematic Review,” in 4th International Science, Education, Art
& Technology Symposium, 2025, pp. 403–415, October.
S. Gunasekara and M. Saarela, “Explainable AI in Education:
Techniques and Qualitative Assessment,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no.
3, p. 1239, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15031239.
I. K. Nti and S. Ramanayake, “Explainable machine learning for
student dropout prediction and tailored interventions in online
personalized education,” Discov. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 288,
Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44163-026-01016-6.
E. De La Hoz, C. Garcia-Yerena, and I. Torres-Rojas, “Actionable
Learning Analytics: Predicting University Performance Levels
with Interpretable Machine Learning,” J. Effic. Responsibility.
Educ. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Mar. 2026, doi:
10.7160/eriesj. 2026.190102.
M. Husayn, O. R. Adegboye, and A. Alzubi, “GWO-Optimized
Ensemble Learning for Interpretable and Accurate Prediction of
Student
Academic Performance in Smart Learning
Environments,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 22, p. 12163, Nov. 2025,
doi: 10.3390/app152212163.
S. G. Essa, T. Celik, and N. E. Human-Hendricks, “Personalized
adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning
techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature
review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 48392–48409, 2023.
D. Goštautaitė and L. Sakalauskas, “Multi-Label Classification
and Explanation Methods for Students’ Learning Style Prediction
and Interpretation,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1–19, May,
2022, doi: 10.3390/app12115396